Phetchaburi · Mueang Phetchaburi

Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam — the ordination hall whose paintings carry their own date

A small temple on what used to be an island in the Phetchaburi river, holding one of the very few Thai mural cycles that says when it was painted: the walls of its ordination hall carry the year B.E. 2277, in the reign of King Borommakot, written into the work.

วัดเกาะแก้วสุทธาราม · Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam

Share
The record

What the official record says

Official nameวัดเกาะแก้วสุทธาราม — Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam
WhereTha Rap, Mueang Phetchaburi, Phetchaburi
Royal temple classNot established from an official register.
Monastic orderNot recorded in any register we could read.
Ancient monumentRegistered national ancient monument
Royal Gazette vol. 71 part 3, 5 January B.E. 2497; boundary vol. 101 special part 27, p. 20, 1 March B.E. 2527
This temple is not in the 1935 national list; it comes on to the register nineteen years later. The instrument is the ประกาศกรมศิลปากร เรื่อง กำหนดจำนวนและขอบเขตโบราณสถานสำหรับชาติ published at vol. 71 part 3 on 5 January B.E. 2497, and in its Phetchaburi section this temple is item 1, given in Tambon Tha Rap with an area of about 12 rai 1 ngan. The scan was read as text in this run; the square-wa figure after the ngan was not legible in two passes at different resolutions and is therefore omitted rather than guessed. The monument land was then fixed again by the boundary order of 1 March B.E. 2527 at about 3 rai, which is the figure the register's structured area field carries. The two gazetted areas do not match and nothing read here explains the difference, so both are printed. The B.E. 2527 order also recites the earlier registration under the district of Khlong Krachaeng and gives the modern district as Mueang Phetchaburi.
Coordinates13.097416, 99.949749
Fine Arts Department register, monument 0004983 (GPS)
Map

Where Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam is

Open in Google MapsDirections

Founding

When was it founded — and what actually establishes that?

Thai temple histories mix two different kinds of statement, and this guide keeps them apart. What a register, a gazette entry, an inscription or a dated royal act shows is one thing. What the chronicles and the temple itself hold is another, and it is worth telling as what it is.

What the record showsThe paintings date themselves, which is rare enough in Thailand to be the reason this temple matters. The Fine Arts Department register states that the murals written on the walls inside the ordination hall record the year in which they were painted — B.E. 2277, in the reign of King Borommakot, whose reign the same register gives as B.E. 2275 to 2301 — and that the temple must therefore have existed by the late Ayutthaya period. That is a dated statement inside the work itself rather than a chronicle or an attribution, and it is the department's own reading of it.
What tradition holdsLocal usage holds that the temple is simply Wat Ko, the island temple, and the register attributes the name to the water: the Phetchaburi river ran along its western side, one channel branched north of the compound and another south of it — the southern one called Khlong Wat Ko, separating this temple from Wat Chan — and the two rejoined to the east, leaving the ground an island.

What is dated is the painting, not the foundation. The register infers from the murals that the temple was already standing in the late Ayutthaya period, which is a floor and not a date: nothing read in this run says when the monastery began or who began it. The inference is the department's and is given in its words.

History

The history of Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam

Almost no Thai wall painting is dated. Cycles are attributed by style, by reign, by the fabric they sit on and by the arguments of art historians, and the arguments move. Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam is the exception people cite, and the Fine Arts Department states the reason in its own register: the paintings on the walls inside the ordination hall record the year in which they were painted, B.E. 2277, in the reign of King Borommakot. That single fact is why a small, plain temple in a back street of Phetchaburi turns up in the literature on late Ayutthaya painting far more often than temples ten times its size.

The date does work in two directions. Forwards, it anchors a mural cycle to a year rather than to a reign or a century, which gives every other undated cycle something to be compared against. Backwards, it establishes that the monastery was standing by then — the department draws exactly that inference and no more. Nothing read for this page says when the temple began or who began it, and the department does not offer a guess. A floor is not a foundation date, and this page keeps the two apart.

The name is about water. The register explains that the compound was once genuinely an island: the Phetchaburi river ran down its western side, a channel left the main river and ran east along the north of the temple, and a second channel ran along the south — Khlong Wat Ko, which separated this temple from Wat Chan — before the two met again to the east. Everything around it is dry ground now, and local people have shortened the name to Wat Ko, the island temple, which is what you will hear if you ask directions.

The state came to it late. This temple is not in the great national monuments list of 1935 that carries most of Phetchaburi's registered sites; it arrives on the register in January B.E. 2497, in an announcement that fixes both the number and the boundaries of national monuments, where it is the first of three Phetchaburi entries at about 12 rai 1 ngan. Thirty years later a boundary order of March B.E. 2527 fixed the monument land again, at about 3 rai. The two gazetted areas are far apart, both were read firsthand for this page, and nothing found here explains the difference. Both are given below rather than one being quietly preferred.

The condition is worth knowing before you go. The department's own assessment is that the monument is in good order but that parts of the mural surface have flaked away, and it records that the temple's museum now occupies the three-room monks' quarters while the former museum building is used as a classroom for the monastic school. It is a working temple and a small one. BAANLYY does not represent it and nothing here is religious advice.

On site

What you actually see

The ordination hall and its paintings — the reason to come. The Fine Arts Department register records that the murals carry the year of their own painting, B.E. 2277, in the reign of King Borommakot, and the department's condition note is that parts of the painted surface have flaked away.

The pediment and the door arch of the ordination hall, which the department lists as components of the monument in their own right alongside the paintings inside.

The vihara, and two kinds of chedi in the compound: a chedi song khrueang, the ornamented type, and subsidiary chedi rai.

The kuti sam hong — the three-room monks' quarters — which the department records as housing the temple's museum today.

The sala kan parian, the preaching hall, and the sala tha nam, the landing pavilion at the water, which is the surviving sign that this ground was once an island with the river on its western side.

The former museum building, which the department records as now serving as a classroom for the monastic school.

Visiting

Visiting: hours, admission, dress and photography

This is a working place of worship for millions of people rather than an attraction, and it is treated as one at the gate. Where a figure below is blank, no source we are prepared to cite states it.

HoursNot established from an official source.
AdmissionNot established from an official source.
DressA small working temple. Shoulders and knees covered; shoes off before the ordination hall.
PhotographyNo state source read in this run states a photography rule here. Late-Ayutthaya painting is light-sensitive and flash should be assumed unwelcome inside the ordination hall unless the temple says otherwise.
Getting thereTambon Tha Rap, Mueang Phetchaburi, south of the town centre near Wat Chan, on ground that was once an island in the Phetchaburi river. Access to the painted interior of the ordination hall is at the temple's discretion and no state source read here states when it is open.
Before you rely on the figures aboveThe hours could not be confirmed from an official source. Unlike the other temples in this batch, the Tourism Authority appears to publish no attraction page for it at all: the address under its name was tried in a rendering browser in this run and returns the authority's error page. Nothing has been copied from a travel site in its place.
Open

What we could not establish

Every temple reference repeats claims nobody has checked. These are the ones we went looking for and could not stand up, listed so you know exactly where this page stops.

FAQ

Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam: common questions

What makes the murals at Wat Ko Kaeo Suttharam important?

They tell you when they were painted, and almost no Thai murals do. The Fine Arts Department's national register records that the paintings on the walls inside the ordination hall carry the year of their own execution, B.E. 2277, in the reign of King Borommakot. Nearly every other surviving cycle in the country is dated by style, by the reign of a patron or by the building it sits in, all of which are arguments rather than facts. A cycle with a year written into it gives the undated ones something fixed to be measured against, which is why a small temple turns up so often in the literature.

Does the date of the murals tell you when the temple was built?

No, and the Fine Arts Department is careful about this in its own wording. What the dated paintings establish is that the monastery was standing by the time they were made, in the late Ayutthaya period. That is a floor, not a foundation. Nothing in the register, in either gazette instrument read for this page, or in any other state source reached in this run says when the temple began or who began it, and this guide does not supply a year that no document carries.

Why does this temple have two different official areas?

Because two instruments fixed it and they disagree. The announcement of 5 January B.E. 2497, which brought the temple on to the national register, gives its area as about 12 rai 1 ngan. The boundary order of 1 March B.E. 2527 fixes the monument land at about 3 rai, and the register's own structured area field carries that later figure. Both scans were downloaded and read for this page. Nothing read here explains what happened between the two, so both figures are printed rather than one being quietly preferred.

Why is it called Wat Ko?

Because it was an island. The Fine Arts Department register explains the name from the water around it: the Phetchaburi river ran along the western side of the compound, one channel branched off the main river and ran east along the north of the temple, and another ran along the south — Khlong Wat Ko, which separated this temple from Wat Chan — and the two rejoined to the east, leaving the temple ground surrounded. The channels have gone and the shortened name has stayed.

Nearby

Where to go from here

Before you go, read the guide to Buddhism and temple etiquette in Thailand — dress, footwear, where photography is not welcome and how to behave around monks. The rest of Phetchaburi’s temples are covered here too.

Every temple here sits in a place worth reading about on its own terms. The nationwide temple guide covers the other provinces to the same documentary standard as this page, and says on each one what the record establishes and what it does not.

If you are thinking about more than a visit: work out which Thai visa route fits your situation, and see what is available to rent and buy in residences across Thailand.

Sources & References

Sources & References

Every fact on this page is drawn from the sources above. Where they disagree, this page says so rather than choosing silently. Registrations, fees, hours and access change; confirm anything you are relying on with the authority concerned. BAANLYY LLC is a Nevada company and a listing portal, does not represent any temple, and offers no legal or religious advice.