A Sukhothai lotus-bud chedi on a low hill opposite Wat Phra Borommathat, famous under a name the state's own record attributes to a prince's 1921 guess and then argues with.
เจดีย์ยุทธหัตถี · Chedi Yutthahatthi
By the BAANLYY Editorial Team · Last checked 2 November 2026
| Official name | เจดีย์ยุทธหัตถี — Chedi Yutthahatthi |
|---|---|
| Where | Ko Taphao, Ban Tak, Tak |
| Royal temple class | Not established from an official register. |
| Monastic order | Not recorded in any register we could read. |
| Ancient monument | Registered national ancient monument Royal Gazette vol. 114, special part 87 ngor, 29 September B.E. 2540, page 2 — the same Fine Arts Department instrument that registered Wat Phra Borommathat, per a Fine Arts Department-derived compilation; not read at source Two different things are known to two different standards here, and the page keeps them apart. That the monument is registered with a declared land boundary is read firsthand: the department's own map service codes this id status 5. Which instrument did it is not. No gazette instrument naming Chedi Yutthahatthi was opened in this run, and the department's index of its own publications for B.E. 2538 to 2540 carries a title string truncated before it reaches Tak. The attribution to the September B.E. 2540 instrument, alongside Wat Phra Borommathat 270 m away, comes from a compilation derived from department data rather than from the department or the gazette, and the declared area is published nowhere read here. Note separately that an instrument of 9 February B.E. 2539 registers a monument also called Chedi Yutthahatthi; Thailand has more than one, the best-known being at Don Chedi in Suphan Buri, and that entry is not this one. |
| Coordinates | 17.063805, 99.042225 Fine Arts Department register, monument layer, monument 0003877; put through the register's subdistrict polygon layer, which returns Ko Taphao (630205) in Ban Tak (6302), matching the monument's text record. The point lies about 270 m north of the register's point for Wat Phra Borommathat, consistent with every source that places the two opposite one another |
Thai temple histories mix two different kinds of statement, and this guide keeps them apart. What a register, a gazette entry, an inscription or a dated royal act shows is one thing. What the chronicles and the temple itself hold is another, and it is worth telling as what it is.
No state source read in this run endorses the elephant-duel identification, and the hedging is itself documented. Prince Damrong's own account of B.E. 2464 records that the townspeople did not recognize the monument, called it a prang, and that nobody knew who had built it — so the duel name is not an old local tradition he wrote down, it is a reading that starts with him. The hill's popular name, Doi Chang, and the popular alternative name Chedi Chon Chang come from the same naming impulse and cannot be used to support it.
This is the best-measured monument in the province and the one whose name is least secure, and both facts come from the same state source. The Ministry of Tourism's directory gives it as brick with stucco render, a base 12 meters wide, 16 meters high, a square relic-chamber with redented corners rising into a square redented shaft and then a lotus-bud finial, topped by a tiered umbrella. It notes traces of repair throughout its history without loss of the original form, stucco lion-face motifs around the base of the lotus bud, and that the lion face on the north side is still intact. That last clause is a condition statement precise enough to check on arrival.
The lotus-bud top is the point. It is the signature Sukhothai form, and the directory's reasoning for a Sukhothai date is exactly that the form does not appear in other periods. The same source, in the same field, then attributes the monument's famous name to Prince Damrong Rajanubhab as a surmise — that the chedi was raised to honor Ramkhamhaeng's victory in the elephant duel against Khun Sam Chon of Mueang Chot — and immediately adds, in parentheses of its own, that modern archaeologists take the site for a Sukhothai-period monastery. A state tourism body publishing the dissent against its own headline attraction's name is rare, and it is the honest position.
Prince Damrong's account undercuts the name further, and it is his own. Writing of his visit in B.E. 2464 he recorded a Sukhothai-type chedi on a hilltop, about 10 wa high, still in good condition — and that the townspeople did not recognize it, called it a prang, and that nobody knew who had built it. If the duel were local memory, that is where it would have been. It was not there. The published scholarly case against the identification runs along two further lines: that the art belongs to a later Sukhothai phase, from the reign of Mahathammaracha Lithai onward, a generation after Ramkhamhaeng; and that the chedi does not stand alone at all, because there is a vihara base in front of it, which matters because the argument is that solitary commemorative monuments are not a pre-Ayutthaya Thai practice, while monasteries are. The alternative reading offered is that this is the principal relic-chedi of Mueang Tak.
None of which makes the monument less worth the walk, and the geography is part of it. It stands on a low hill opposite Wat Phra Borommathat — the Tak provincial office puts the duel site on a hill about 500 m from the relic-shrine — so the two are one stop, and the state's own one-day itinerary for Mueang Tak, Ban Tak and Sam Ngao treats them that way before carrying on up highway 1107 to Pha Sam Ngao. The road itself is named for the two ends of that run. What a reader should take away is that the chedi is securely Sukhothai, securely registered, carefully measured, and named after an event that no state source will say happened here.
The chedi itself: brick with stucco render, a base 12 m wide and 16 m high, a square relic-chamber with redented corners, a square redented shaft above it, a lotus-bud finial and a tiered umbrella at the very top.
The stucco lion-face motifs around the base of the lotus bud — the one on the north side is recorded as still intact, the others less so.
The traces of repeated repair across the fabric, which the Ministry of Tourism notes have not cost the monument its original form.
The base of a vihara standing in front of the chedi, which is the physical fact at the center of the argument that this was a monastery rather than a free-standing memorial. No state source read describes it.
The low hill it sits on, opposite Wat Phra Borommathat and about 500 m from it, with interpretive signage on site.
This is a working place of worship for millions of people rather than an attraction, and it is treated as one at the gate. Where a figure below is blank, no source we are prepared to cite states it.
| Hours | Not established from an official source. |
|---|---|
| Admission | Thai nationals: free. Foreign visitors: free. |
| Dress | Not a working monastery and no dress rule is published, but it is a consecrated Buddhist monument on a hill: shoulders and knees covered is the courteous default, and do not climb on the brickwork. |
| Photography | No source we found states a rule, so we print none. |
| Getting there | On a low hill in Tambon Ko Taphao, Amphoe Ban Tak, opposite Wat Phra Borommathat and about 500 m from it. Reached on highway 1107 from the city of Tak; the Ministry of Tourism lists car, motorcycle, bicycle and on foot, and its own one-day Mueang Tak to Ban Tak to Sam Ngao itinerary pairs this monument with Wat Phra Borommathat as a single stop before continuing to Pha Sam Ngao. |
Every temple reference repeats claims nobody has checked. These are the ones we went looking for and could not stand up, listed so you know exactly where this page stops.
No state source read in this run says so. The Ministry of Tourism's own entry attributes the identification to Prince Damrong Rajanubhab as a surmise, resting on the chedi's Sukhothai lotus-bud form, and then states in the same field that modern archaeologists take the site for a Sukhothai-period monastery. The episode itself is in Sukhothai inscription number 1, whose date is disputed; nothing ties it to this hill.
Ramkhamhaeng, in his father's reign. The inscription account has Khun Sam Chon of Mueang Chot attack Mueang Tak during Si Inthrathit's reign, and Ramkhamhaeng, then nineteen, drive his elephant to his father's aid and beat him — which is why his father gave him the name Phra Ram Khamhaeng, and why the state sources name Ramkhamhaeng in the monument's alternative title.
The Ministry of Tourism gives 16 meters on a base 12 meters wide. Prince Damrong Rajanubhab, writing of his visit in B.E. 2464, put it at about 10 wa, roughly 20 meters, and said about. The two figures have not been reconciled and both are printed here.
The argument is live and it turns on a physical feature. There is a vihara base in front of the chedi, and the published scholarly case is that this makes the site a monastery rather than a solitary memorial, since free-standing commemorative monuments are not a pre-Ayutthaya Thai practice. The register files it as an ancient monument and takes no view.
A prang, and they did not know what it was. Prince Damrong recorded in B.E. 2464 that the townspeople did not recognize the monument, used that name for it, and that nobody knew who built it. The elephant-duel name postdates his visit.
Before you go, read the guide to Buddhism and temple etiquette in Thailand — dress, footwear, where photography is not welcome and how to behave around monks. The rest of Tak’s temples are covered here too.
Every temple here sits in a place worth reading about on its own terms. The nationwide temple guide covers the other provinces to the same documentary standard as this page, and says on each one what the record establishes and what it does not.
If you are thinking about more than a visit: work out which Thai visa route fits your situation, and see what is available to rent and buy in residences across Thailand.
Last checked 2 November 2026
Every fact on this page is drawn from the sources above. Where they disagree, this page says so rather than choosing silently. Registrations, fees, hours and access change; confirm anything you are relying on with the authority concerned. BAANLYY LLC is a Nevada company and a listing portal, does not represent any temple, and offers no legal or religious advice.